![]() If it's 2vsX it's hard to counter against and hard to know that you aren't outnumbered (it really shines in 2vs1). One might view Austerlitz as the hammer and anvil writ large, but the russian hammer was forstalled by Davouts timely arrival and the anvil of the Pratzen heights proved brittle to Soults adamant advance. 1-2 people is enough to disrupt the flanking and the mobile unit can then move to either assult the anvil or the hammer.Īnd that 2vs2 is a good example on what morale influence the tactic have. IIRC Blucher attempted to hammer and anvil Davout in Paris after Waterloo, and had his cav savagely ripped up by a prompt countermove. If I get the tactic properly, it's flanking with the anvil as an distraction, so when the hammer comes, the opponent lack cover from the flanking side and is easily killed before they can react properly.Ĭounter measures would be a rear guard and avoiding to get all pinned down (aka they can fairly easily disengage). That flanking is a sort of envelopment from one side. The scenario derives its name from a classic military maneuver, in which an advancing enemy is allowed to pass a screen of concealed forces, then is confronted. They will wrap around the enemy line to kill skirmishers, artillery, perform flanking maneuvers, and the hammer and anvil. A more normal tactic these days is a standard envelopment and crossfire. The patents oI Watt and Deveril did not concern themselves with the laying of hammer ioundations or the problems they were meant to. Intro Why HAMMER & ANVIL is the STRONGEST - Total War Tactics: Warhammer 3 Zerkovich 200K subscribers 295K views 1 year ago A new Total War Tactic for Warhammer 3 Hammer and Anvil is a. The heavy anvil sits on timber baulks of wood, lhemseves resiing on a concrete foundation with an integrally cast pedeslal or shoulder. In modern tactics (Especially in paintball), hammer and anvil don't make much sense as both sides don't have a formation to stick to and therefore can easily move around. A steam hammer was patented and made by Francois Cave in 1836, see Fig. If your hammer gets delayed long enough (in old times this could simply be by tougher terrain) or is properly counter-attacked and the anvil is slow, then your opponent can crush one of the sides before the other can properly engage. In general, the main weakness is the splitting up of your forces. :laugh4: I've even seen another double-layer on that sandwish.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |